Cezanne’s view of Lake Annecy

following up on Cezanne posting.

1896:

2025:

Think this is pretty much the spot. Does seem like he truncated/compressed the view. That’s the art!

The site is now the wonderful-seeming hotel Auberge du Père Bise (it’ll run you $500 something a night). The two Michelin starred – “worth a detour” – Jean Sulpice restaurant attached.

Across the lake there is the Chateau de Duignt.

Shit even as I was taking this I was like I can’t even take the photo even close to as good as Cezanne painted it!

[Cezanne] struggled with what he considered an overly charming setting, which contrasted with the rugged landscape of his native Provence.

says The Courtland.

Cézanne described this mountain lake near the French border with Switzerland as a scene one might expect to find in ‘the albums of young lady travellers’

says Art UK.

For me, I like the place! Was ok with the overly charming setting.

Cheers to the Annecy Animation Festival, full of gratitude and happy to be there.

Good essay by Jeffrey Meyers on Hemingway x Cezanne.


Islands In The Stream, (Hemingway, 1970) x Islands In The Stream, (B. Gibb, M. Gibb, R. Gibb, 1983)

A man named Thomas Hudson, who was a good painter, lived there in that house and worked there and on the island the greater part of the year. After one has lived in those latitudes long enough the changes of the seasons become as important there as anywhere else and Thomas Hudson, who loved the island, did not want to miss any spring, nor summer, nor any fall or winter.

Sometimes the summers were too hot when the wind dropped in August or when the trade winds sometimes failed in June and July. Hurricanes, too, might come in September and October and even in early November and there could be freak tropical storms any time from June on. But the true hurricane months have fine weather when there are no storms.

Thomas Hudson had studied tropical storms for many years and he could tell from the sky when there was a tropical disturbance long before his barometer showed its presence. He knew how to plot storms and the precautions that should be taken against them. He knew too what it was to live through a hurricane with the other people of the island and the bond that the hurricane made between all people who had been through it. He also knew that hurricanes could be so bad that nothing could live through them. He always thought, though, that if there was ever one that bad he would like to be there for it and go with the house if she went.

The house felt almost as much like a ship as a house. Placed there to ride out storms, it was built into the island as though it were a part of it; but you saw the sea from all the windows and there was good cross ventilation so that you slept cool on the hottest nights. The house was painted white to be cool in the summer and it could be seen from a long way out in the Gulf Stream. It was the highest thing on the island except for the long planting of tall casuarina trees that were the first thing you saw as you raised the island out of the sea. Soon after you saw the dark blur of casuarina trees above the line of the sea, you would see the white bulk of the house. Then, as you came closer, you raised the whole length of the island with the coconut palms, the clapboarded houses, the white line of the beach, and the of the South Island stretching beyond it. Thomas Hudson never saw the house, there on that island, but that the sight of her made him happy. He always thought of the house as her exactly as he would have thought of a ship. In the winter, when the northers blew and it was really cold, the house was warm and comfortable because it had the only fireplace on the island.

It was a big open fireplace and Thomas Hudson burned driftwood in it.

He had a big pile of driftwood stacked against the south wall of the house. It was whitened by the sun and sand-scoured by the wind and he would become fond of different pieces so that he would hate to burn them. But there was always more driftwood along the beach after the big storms and he found it was fun to burn even the pieces he was fond of. He knew the sea would sculpt more, and on a cold night he would sit in the big chair in front of the fire, reading by the lamp that stood on the heavy plank table and look up while he was reading to hear the northwester blowing outside and the crashing of the surf and watch the great, bleached pieces of driftwood burning.

Sometimes he would put the lamp out and lie on the rug on the floor and watch the edges of color that the sea salt and the sand in the wood made in the flame as they burned. On the floor his eyes were even with the line of the burning wood and he could see the line of the flame when it left the wood and it made him both sad and happy. All wood that burned affected him in this way. But burning driftwood did something to him that he could not define. He thought that it was probably wrong to burn it when he was so fond of it; but he felt no guilt about it.

(Bold mine.)

This book knocked me sideways.

After enjoying Across The River and Into the Trees, I wondered if I should try this. It doesn’t get discussed much. It was published posthumously, ten years after Hemingway’s death. Apparently Mary Hemingway found it and brought it to Scribner’s. For a craftsman like Hemingway you’ve got to be suspicious of anything he himself didn’t consider finished.

This post by a Redditor was all I needed to push me into ordering a good UK edition with an appealing cover.

Hemingway began the novel–as Carlos Baker relates in his excellent biography–at a low point of fortune. It was 1950 and “Across the River and Into the Trees” had just taken a critical beating. In December he began something new; it was to be a series of three books called “The Sea When Young,” “The Sea When Absent” and “The Sea in Being.” The work gathered momentum during the first half of 1951–Hemingway was writing enthusiastically and well–but an odd thing happened to his general scheme. It was conceived as a linked series of three independent novellas concerned with three different eras in the life of Thomas Hudson, an American marine painter. The first takes place on the island of Bimini, the second in wartime Cuba and the third follows Hudson through to his death at sea in an isolated action of World War II. But another concept intruded, and Hemingway added a fourth part, only to find that it had taken on an independent life of its own quite unrelated to Hudson. In 1952, he published this story as “The Old Man and the Sea,” and it was apparently this diversion, plus various travels in the following years, that kept him from a return to the final polishing he had intended for the novel now titled “Islands in the Stream.”

That’s from the Oct. 1970 New York Times review by Robie McCauley. I won’t link to it and I’d encourage you not to read it because it gives away several turns of plot that hit this reader in surprising and unexpected ways.

The book can be pretty shaggy. Many pages of conversations in bars, about forty pages about trying to catch a swordfish, etc. There’s a fight scene where Roger, Thomas Hudson’s friend, who is a writer, beats the hell out of a yacht guy. The yacht guy had a pretty reasonable complaint is this reader’s opinion, and the beating is unpleasant. Even Roger comes to view it as an ugly event. But when the boys arrive, Thomas Hudson’s mood improves, and the book becomes warm and loving in a way unusual in a Hemingway book.

It’s about a father. Most Hemingway main character/stand ins are pointedly unattached. In the short stories we get a father, but through the eyes of Nick, the son, a boy.

In this book we’re seeing the world through a father who is getting a visit from his kids. Two from one mother, one from another. Thomas has all kinds of feelings and regrets about the situation.

Most of the book (drinking, fishing) really tells a story of avoiding, masking, remembering, processing.

The drinking is preposterous. Regularly Thomas is like “a drink? It’s breakfast. I’ll just have a bottle of beer.” (Heineken)

The kids, who are like twelve-sixteen years old, say stuff like

My friend Mr. Joyce has words and expressions I’d never even heard of. I’ll bet nobody could outswear him in any language.

maybe just as setup for Dad to tell stories about Mr. (James) Joyce. But… don’t you want to hear those?

Well, so what? Maybe Hemingway’s kids talked like that.

Hemingway’s whole fictional project is a kind of exaggerated autobiography. He really got somewhere with Islands In The Stream, a new level of vulnerability couched in braggadocio. His fourth wife published it, even though the main character’s worst regret might be losing his first wife.

-—

The song Islands in the Stream was written by The Bee-Gees. They had it in mind for Diana Ross. Barry Gibb says that in this interview. Many places, including Wikipedia, say the title of the song came from the Hemingway novel published thirteen years previous. I can find no firsthand source where Barry Gibb states that or makes that connection. But the phrase “islands in the stream” doesn’t seem to have existed before Hemingway’s book was published. Some sources link it to the John Donne poem from which EH got another title: “for whom the bell tolls.”

The song ended up with Dolly Parton and Kenny Rodgers, and was released on Kenny Rogers’ album Eyes That See In The Dark.

Baby when I met you it was peace I know

I set out to get you with a fine tooth comb

Wow.

Be careful, the song sticks. It knocked “Total Eclipse of the Heart” out of number one on the Billboard Hot 100. 1983 was quite a year on the Billboard Hot 100: “Islands In The Stream” was knocked off by Lionel Ritchie, “All Night Long.”

Which Islands in the Stream the greater work of art with this title?

Talk about apples and oranges. Or, better, limes and coconuts.

There’s a cocktail recipe contained in the novel: Gordon’s gin, coconut water, lime juice, a dash of Angostura bitters for color. I made a few last night. Jess’s review: “I could drink this all day.”

(source)


Granger seen anew

With Juneteenth coming up we once again turn our thoughts to Gordon Granger. It was he who issued the famous General Order #3 at Galveston in 1865 (better late than never):

The people are informed that in accordance with a Proclamation from the Executive of the United States, all slaves are free.

The newly freed were slammed pretty fast into capitalism:

The freed are advised to remain at their present homes, and work for wages. They are informed that they will not be allowed to collect at military posts; and that they will not be supported in idleness either there or elsewhere.

Geez, not even a small vacation?

We’ve covered Granger before – Grant didn’t like him. But in Charles Dana’s Recollections of the Civil War we came across some new (to us) material that brought the man to life:

After Chickamauga:

Our troops were as immovable as the rocks they stood on. Longstreet hurled against them repeatedly the dense columns which had routed Davis and Sheridan in the early afternoon, but every onset was repulsed with dreadful slaughter. Falling first on one and then another point of our lines, for hours the rebels vainly sought to break them. Thomas seemed to have filled every soldier with his own unconquerable firmness, and Granger, his hat torn by bullets, raged like a lion wherever the combat was hottest with the electrical courage of a Ney. When night fell, this body of heroes stood on the same ground they had occupied in the morning, their spirit unbroken, but their numbers greatly diminished.

Later, in the same campaign, Granger can’t stop firing a cannon personally:

The enemy kept firing shells at us, I remember, from the ridge opposite. They had got the range so well that the shells burst pretty near the top of the elevation where we were, and when we saw them coming we would duck-that is, everybody did except Generals Grant and Thomas and Gordon Granger. It was not according to their dignity to go down on their marrow bones. While we were there Granger got a cannon—how he got it I do not know-and he would load it with the help of one soldier and fire it himself over at the ridge. I recollect that Rawlins was very much disgusted at the guerilla operations of Granger, and induced Grant to order him to join his troops elsewhere.

As we thought we perceived, soon after noon, that the enemy had sent a great mass of their troops to crush Sherman, Grant gave orders at two o’clock for an assault upon the left of their lines; but owing to the fault of Granger, who was boyishly intent upon firing his gun instead of commanding his corps, Grant’s order was not transmitted to the division commanders until he repeated it an hour later.

He can’t stop driving Grant nuts:

The enemy was now divided. Bragg was flying toward Rome and Atlanta, and Longstreet was in East Tennessee besieging Burnside. Our victorious army was between them. The first thought was, of course, to relieve Burnside, and Grant ordered Granger with the Fourth Corps instantly forward to his aid, taking pains to write Granger a personal letter, explaining the exigencies of the case and the imperative need of energy.

It had no effect, however, in hastening the movement, and a day or two later Grant ordered Sherman to assume command of all the forces operating from the south to save Knoxville. Grant became imbued with a strong prejudice against Granger from this circumstance.


How big is Iran compared to the United States?

It’s pretty big. It would stretch from Oregon to Texas.

(Move it around yourself).

I was reminded of this from Halberstam’s Best and the Brightest:

There were men who opposed the invasion or at the very least were uneasy with it, and to a degree, they were the same men who would later oppose the Vietnam commitment. One was General David M. Shoup, Commandant of the Marine Corps. When talk about invading Cuba was becoming fashionable, General Shoup did a remarkable display with maps. First he took an overlay of Cuba and placed it over the map of the United States. To everybody’s surprise, Cuba was not a small island along the lines of, say, Long Island at best. It was about 800 miles long and seemed to stretch from New York to Chicago. Then he took another overlay, with a red dot, and placed it over the map of Cuba. “What’s that?” someone asked him. “That, gentlemen, represents the size of the island of Tarawa,” said Shoup, who had won a Medal of Honor there, “and it took us three days and eighteen thousand Marines to take it.” He eventually became Kennedy’s favorite general.

from Shoup’s Wikipedia page:

On May, 14 1966, Shoup began publicly attacking the [Vietnam] policy in a speech delivered to community college students at Los Angeles Pierce College in Woodland Hills, California, for their World Affairs Day:

I believe that if we had and would keep our dirty, bloody, dollar-soaked fingers out of the business of these nations so full of depressed, exploited people, they will arrive at a solution of their own—and if unfortunately their revolution must be of the violent type because the “haves” refuse to share with the “have-nots” by any peaceful method, at least what they get will be their own, and not the American style, which they above all don’t want crammed down their throats by Americans.

While yapping about Thucydides Trap did we forget Herodotus Trap (war w/Persia? No! Why?)


Good Press

Having a good press week:

New York Times, The Best TV Shows of 2025 So Far

Vulture, 119 Books Every Comedy Fan Should Read

Hollywood Reporter, Ten Best TV Shows of 2025

Vanity Fair, The Best TV Shows of 2025 So Far.

Alan Sepinwall writing in Rolling Stone

You know what? Showbiz is mostly heartbreak and failure so we’re gonna celebrate our wins around here.


Curfew

LA mayor Karen Bass made the front page of Le Monde while we were in France, and gave us a chance to ponder the etymology of “curfew”

from Etymology Online:

curfew(n.)

early 14c., curfeu, “evening signal, ringing of a bell at a fixed hour” as a signal to extinguish fires and lights, from Anglo-French coeverfu (late 13c.), from Old French cuevrefeu, literally “cover fire” (Modern French couvre-feu), from cuevre, imperative of covrir “to cover” (see cover (v.)) + feu “fire” (see focus (n.)). Related: Curfew-bell (early 14c.).

The medieval practice of ringing a bell (usually at 8 or 9 p.m.) as an order to bank the hearths and prepare for sleep was to prevent conflagrations from untended fires. The modern extended sense of “periodic restriction of movement” had evolved by 1800s.


They can’t give this thing away!

Back in 2021 we reported on Platt National Park/Chickasaw National Recreation area, which as far as I know is the only national park ever to be downgraded. We even had a chance to visit. The nature there has been heavily altered by human hand, it’s almost a crafted landscape. That’s not usually how we now like to think of or act in our national parks.

Yesterday in Bloomberg:

mentions the former Platt NP:

Republican Representative Tom Cole of Oklahoma has offered Chickasaw National Recreation Area in Oklahoma as a candidate to be transferred to the Chickasaw Nation, which sold it to the federal government in 1902. Congress turned it into Platt National Park, until it stripped the park of “crown jewel” status and changed its name in 1976.

Today, the park service spends about $4.5 million to accommodate more than 1.5 million annual visitors at Chickasaw NRA.

Cole’s office said the Chickasaw Nation hasn’t asked for the recreation area to be returned, but the nation’s governor, Bill Anoatubby, said in a statement that it’s interested.

So far, though, there’s little other interest in transfers.

Sure, why not?

Worth remembering how we got here though:

In some cases, the National Park Service was put in charge of some areas because residents didn’t trust the states to manage them.

That’s what happened at Big Cypress, which became the first national preserve in 1974. Congress agreed with many south Floridians that the Rhode Island-sized wetland needed to be protected from the state’s plan to build what would have been the world’s largest commercial airport.

Floridians “wanted to protect it and they didn’t trust the state,” McAliley said. “People wanted the Park Service because they trusted them to manage natural qualities.”