England forever!
Posted: April 16, 2016 Filed under: everyone's a critic, Uncategorized, writing Leave a comment
From the Times Literary Supplement, this remarkable sentence in Geoffrey Wheatcroft’s review of Christopher Hitchens posthumous book of essays:
Born to a dyspeptic, reactionary naval officer and a mother whose Jewish origins Hitchens only discovered after her tragic suicide, he was educated at a modest public school and Oxford University, where he delightedly embarked on a double life – radical agitation by day, sybaritic lotus-eating by night – which set the tone for the years to come.
Bookbinderlocal455.com
Posted: April 16, 2015 Filed under: Uncategorized Leave a commentyou gotta keep this one in your rotation.
here’s to pretzels
Posted: April 15th, 2015 | No Comments »
THE WORLD’S DRYEST SNACK
Bao Bao’s first snow day
Posted: January 7, 2015 Filed under: Uncategorized Leave a commentInsurance:
spaghetti [reblog]
Posted: November 17, 2014 Filed under: Uncategorized Leave a commentreblog from Bookbinderlocal455.com:
from the essential guide to hysterectomy:
Without a doubt, the most common question about anatomy involves the mystery of the empty space. Women are really concerned about what’s going to happen to the void left by the uterus. Picture this. If you have a bowl of spaghetti with a large meatball in the middle and a few smaller meatballs on the side, and then someone removes the large meatball, the space the meatball formerly occupied is replaced by the spaghetti. No one would know that the meatball was ever there.
a touching farewell
Posted: October 8, 2014 Filed under: Uncategorized Leave a comment![]()
from this Vulture article about the passing of actress Sarah Goldberg:
Barry Watson, who played her boyfriend on 7th Heaven, tweeted his condolences Tuesday, writing: “#RIP Sarah. I will miss you always. Love Ya! B.”
Gingham Style
Posted: September 25, 2014 Filed under: Uncategorized Leave a commentdon’t know why but got to wondering if anyone made a parody called “Gingham Style”
Yes, of course they did. Not really recommended:
36.262 is somehow the exact saddest number of views this could have.
Gabo
Posted: April 21, 2014 Filed under: Uncategorized Leave a commentHappened to be in Colombia when I learned Gabriel Garcia Marquez died. I had just finished reading One Hundred Years Of Solitude. It was a bit of a slog to read, I felt, although impressive as a human achievement. Possibly its greatness had already been absorbed into later stuff I’ve consumed; always important to view these things in context. In the supplementary material in my edition there’s a story that GGM sent the first eighty pages to Octavio Paz, who declared (I’m picturing this at a dinner party) “I have just read eighty pages by a master.”
I liked this story, from Wiki:
Since García Márquez was eighteen, he had wanted to write a novel based on his grandparents’ house where he grew up. However, he struggled with finding an appropriate tone and put off the idea until one day the answer hit him while driving his family to Acapulco. He turned the car around and the family returned home so he could begin writing. He sold his car so his family would have money to live on while he wrote, but writing the novel took far longer than he expected, and he wrote every day for eighteen months. His wife had to ask for food on credit from their butcher and their baker as well as nine months of rent on credit from their landlord. Fortunately, when the book was finally published in 1967 it became his most commercially successful novel, One Hundred Years of Solitude, which sold more than 30 million copies.
I bet his kids are still pissed about that vacation.
A couple nights later I was drinking with two Colombian university students, and I asked them about Marquez. They both expressed the same opinion. They were disappointed in him. They said that his hometown was one of the poorest places in Colombia. That with all his wealth and success he’s done very little for Colombia, “fucking off to Mexico” as they put it.
My own favorite Marquez short story is called “The Earless One.” It has kind of a Twilight Zone feel.
What happens is a gambler in Mexico City meets an adventurer heading to the Amazon. He offers him a wager of one hundred thousand pesos if he can travel through Latin America overland without once hearing the song “Chan Chan” as recorded by the Buena Vista Social Club. The adventurer accepts.
A week later the gambler received a postcard: “I have not heard it.” He’s surprised: it’s nearly impossible not to hear this song every single day. But he remains calm. A week later another postcard: “Still I have not heard it.” The gambler begins to be concerned. Another week, another card: “I have not heard it still.” The gambler is shocked – how can this be?
Finally, he receives a package. He finds inside a note: “I have not heard it, nor will I.” And inside? The adventurer’s bloody ears.
It turns out he deafened himself – the only way to win this absurd bet.
I’m told this is a metaphor for Colombian politics.
What city am I in?
Posted: April 17, 2014 Filed under: Uncategorized | Tags: wiht Leave a commentImportant work has taken us on the road. Can you guess where?
Send answers to helphely at gmail.com
Lucky winners will receive a copy of The Story Of New York.
Getting caught up on the news
Posted: April 9, 2014 Filed under: Uncategorized Leave a comment
Correlation=causation?
I found the world’s most boring website.
Posted: October 9, 2013 Filed under: Uncategorized 1 CommentI mean it.
I am proud of this discovery.
In every way: content, style, it is perfectly, wonderfully flavorless.
I think if you pitched on boring websites for a long time you would not do better than this.
I’m building it up like this because I’m confident in it, in its boring beauty.
It keeps giving, all the way to the end, like a well-crafted work of art.
Here it is.
Pretty baller
Posted: July 19, 2013 Filed under: Uncategorized Leave a commentTo have your picture in the dictionary.
I was looking up cloaca:
Steven Soderbergh
Posted: March 18, 2013 Filed under: film, Uncategorized 2 Comments
I look at Hurricane Katrina, and I think if four days before landfall you gave a movie studio autonomy and a 100th of the billions the government spent on that disaster, and told them, “Lock this place down and get everyone taken care of,” we wouldn’t be using that disaster as an example of whatnot to do. A big movie involves clothing, feeding, and moving thousands of people around the world on a tight schedule. Problems are solved creatively and efficiently within a budget, or your ass is out of work. So when I look at what’s going on in the government, the gridlock, I think, Wow, that’s a really inefficient way to run a railroad. The government can’t solve problems because the two parties are so wedded to their opposing ideas that they can’t move. The very idea that someone from Congress can’t take something from the other side because they’ll be punished by their own party? That’s stupid. If I were running for office, I would be poaching ideas from everywhere. That’s how art works. You steal from everything. I must remember to tweet that I’m in fact not running for office.
(I can’t agree that the entertainment biz is a model of efficiency)
On the few occasions where I’ve talked to film students, one of the things I stress, in addition to learning your craft, is how you behave as a person. For the most part, our lives are about telling stories. So I ask them, “What are the stories you want people to tell about you?” Because at a certain point, your ability to get a job could turn on the stories people tell about you. The reason [then–Universal Pictures chief] Casey Silver put me up for [1998’s] Out of Sight after I’d had five flops in a row was because he liked me personally. He also knew I was a responsible filmmaker, and if I got that job, the next time he’d see me was when we screened the movie. If I’m an asshole, then I don’t get that job. Character counts. That’s a long way of saying, “If you can be known as someone who can attract talent, that’s a big plus.”
I was watching one of those iconoclast shows on the Sundance Channel. Jamie Oliver said Paul Smith had told him something he hadn’t understood until very recently: “I’d rather be No. 2 forever than No. 1 for a while.” Just make stuff and don’t agonize over it. Stop worrying about being No. 1. I see a lot of people getting paralyzed by the response to their work, the imagined result. It’s like playing a Jedi mind trick on yourself, and Smith is right. That’s the way I’ve always approached films, the way I approach everything. Just make ’em.
Bummer Headlines
Posted: December 9, 2012 Filed under: Uncategorized Leave a commentRacetrack Drugs Put Europe Off U.S. Horse Meat
The picture, by Christinne Muschi, is appropriately grim:
This sounds like a sad story, Slate.
Posted: November 30, 2012 Filed under: Uncategorized 1 Comment
Help! How Can I Tell My Infertile Asian Wife I Want All-White Babies?
Headshot of an opera star I discovered on an Internet ramble which will now haunt my dreams.
Posted: September 3, 2012 Filed under: Uncategorized Leave a comment
“Hello. I want to be near you. Forever.”
An alert reader in our LIC office
Posted: April 3, 2012 Filed under: Uncategorized 2 CommentsPoints out Tyler Cowen’s review of “Mirror, Mirror,” published here in its entirety.
*Mirror, Mirror* (paging Leo Strauss)
Not often does Hollywood put out movies romanticizing tyrannicide and the assassination of foreign leaders of friendly countries, in this case India. Julia Roberts is the wicked Queen, witch, and false pretender, but actually the stand-in for Indira Gandhi, with an uncanny resemblance of look and dress in the final scene (I wonder if anyone told her?). This movie presents a romanticized and idealized version of how her assassination should have proceeded and should have been processed, namely in a triumphal manner with no reprisals but rather celebration and joyous union and love. As the plot proceeds, you will find all sorts of markers of Sikh theology, including numerous references to daggers, hair, mirrors, water, immersions, submersions, bodily penetrations, transformations, the temple at Amritsar, dwarves who enlarge themselves, and the notion of woman as princess, among many others; director Tarsem Singh knows this material better than I do (read up on Sikh theology before you go, if you haven’t already). The silly critics complained that the plot didn’t make sense, but from the half dozen or so reviews I read they didn’t even begin to understand the movie.
Without wishing to take sides on either the politics or the religion, I found this a daring and remarkable film. The sad thing is that no one is paying attention.
The movie’s trailer is here.
“Amusing Ourselves To Death” by Neil Postman
Posted: March 21, 2012 Filed under: Uncategorized Leave a commentReading doomsaying screeds from awhile ago is strangely comforting, because either a) things didn’t happen as the author direly predicted or 2) they DID happen, like 1000x worse than what the author predicted, but I guess we just deal.
File Neil Postman’s 1984 Amusing Ourselves to Death in category 2.
Postman’s book is worried about the rise of TV. He holds out for special, extended, outraged scorn The Voyage of The Mimi, which is a pretty amazing thing to be mad about.
Towards the end, Postman wonders what we can do about the stupidity of TV:
The nonsensical answer is to create television programs whose intent would be, not to get people to stop watching television but to demonstrate how television ought to be viewed, to show how television recreates and degrades our conception of news, political debate, religious thought, etc. I imagine such demonstrations would of necessity take the form of parodies, along the lines of “Saturday Night Live” and “Monty Python,” the idea being to induce a nationwide horse laugh over television’s control of public discourse. But, naturally, television would have the last laugh. In order to command an audience large enough to make a difference, one would have to make the programs vastly amusing, in the television style. Thus, the act of criticism itself would, in the end, be co-opted by television. The parodists would become celebrities, would star in movies, and would end up making television commercials.
You called it, buddy.









